Reviewers Section

The main duties as a member of the JASEI Reviewers Committee will be to review papers submitted to the journal, submit papers, recommending new reviewer committee members, suggesting topics improvements, and disseminating the Call for Papers.

As a fully peer-refereed journal, submitted work should meet a high standard, only accepted papers will be published in the journal, and so the member's role of the review board is to provide commentary, criticism, and opinion for those papers that they review.

Researchers and authors are invited to participate in the peer-review process of JASEI papers if your research interest matches with the themes of Call for Papers.

The review process is double-blind one.

The most important parts of your review are the written comments that will be transmitted to the author. On the review form , please give a straightforward assessment of the importance of the ideas and/or results presented in the paper. Your written comments should provide a thorough appraisal of the reported work.

Reviewers are generally expected to complete their review within a four weeks period.

If you are unable to review. please find a competent alternate reviewer, else notify us immediately so that we can pass it on to another JASEI reviewer.

Reviews should be constructive and provide feedback to the authors. Reviewers are also encouraged to suggest ways to improve the paper, even if it is acceptable in its original form. The completed review form should be electronically returned to the JASEI Managing Editor.

If you would like to become an JASEI reviewer, you should fill in the form below and subsequently send us your CV at JoASEI@Hotmail.com. You will receive an email informing you whether you have been qualified to be part of the JASEI Reviewers Committee.